On Wednesday, 14 May 2014 the High Court will deliver
judgment in two cases.
The first is Gillard v The Queen, in which the High Court has been asked to
consider the role of recklessness in proving absence of consent in relation to
various sexual assault offences under the ACT Crimes Act 1900.
The second is MacarthurCook Fund Management Ltd v TFML Limited, in which the High
Court will consider whether the
procedures set out in Part 5C.6 of the Corporations Act 2001 apply to
all methods by which a member of a registered managed investment scheme ceases
to be a member, or whether it only applies where the member voluntarily seeks
the return of that member’s contribution to the scheme.
On Friday, 16 May 2014 another two judgments will be delivered by the
High Court.
The first is Adco Constructions Pty Ltd v Goudappel which relates to the transitional operation of certain
amendments to the Workers Compensation Act 1987, but more generally will consider the correct approach to the
construction of provisions in an Act which authorize the making of regulations
that have a transitional operation and which themselves amend the operation of
the Act.
The second is Sidhu v Van Dyke. In that case the plaintiff alleged she had
acted to her detriment in reliance upon promises made by the defendant in
relation to her interest in property, allegedly giving rise to a constructive
trust in her favour. The High Court will
consider whether it is necessary for the plaintiff to establish that the
promises were the sole cause for her acting to her detriment, and whether the appropriate
measure of compensation was the detriment suffered by the plaintiff, or the
value of the unfulfilled promises.
No comments:
Post a Comment