On Wednesday, 7 August 2013 the High Court will deliver
judgment in two outstanding cases.
The first is judgment in Leo Akiba (on behalf of the Torres Strait Regional Sea Claims Group) v Commonwealth of Australia. These proceedings arise out of a native title determination application
filed on behalf of the Torres Strait Regional Seas Claim Group. The
application was opposed by the Commonwealth, the State of Queensland, a large
group of people and companies collectively described as “The Commercial Fishing
Parties” and a small number of parties from Papua New Guinea. The
application sought a determination of native title rights and interests in a
large part of the sea area of the Torres Strait. The occupation of the
region by the Seas Claim Group and their ancestors was of an essentially
maritime character. The sea is an integral presence in the lives and
livelihood of the Islander communities that comprise the Seas Claim Group. At
issue is whether or not there is a single Torres Strait Island society for the
purposes of the Native Title Act 1993, whether rights held under
traditional laws and customs on the basis of a ‘reciprocal relationship’ with a
holder of ‘occupation based rights’ are native title rights or interests for
the purposes of the Act, and whether or not the laws of The Commonwealth and
the State of Queensland governing fishing rights had extinguished such native
title as the plaintiff’s might otherwise have held.
The second is judgment in Fortescue Metals Group Limited v Commonwealth of Australia, the challenge by Andrew
Forrest to the Commonwealth’s Mineral Resources Rent Tax, more common known as
the Mining Tax.
it,s the great blog
ReplyDeletethanks
Fisheries Lawyer | Fisheries Law Australia