On Friday, 15 February 2013 the High Court granted special
leave to appeal in two cases, and allowed the appeal instanter in a third.
Agius v The Queen is an appeal against a decision of the NSW Court
of Criminal Appeal which raises the question of whether a charge properly lies
in respect of a conspiracy to defraud where the agreement underlying the
alleged conspiracy was formed prior to the commencement of the offence
provision, but the agreement was given effect to after that commencement.
Lee v NSW Crime Commission is an appeal from the NSW Court of
Appeal in which the Court made orders for the compulsory examination of the
appellant under the Criminal Assets
Recovery Act 1990 (NSW) notwithstanding that there were pending criminal
charges against the appellant to which the answers given during the examination
might be relevant.
In a third case, Dunrobin v The Queen, an appeal from the
Court of Appeal in Queensland, the High Court granted special leave to appeal,
treated the appeal as having been instituted and heard instanter, and allowed
the appeal. Following a concession by
the Crown that the Court of Appeal had erred, the High Court entered a verdict
of acquittal in relation to one count and remitted the remainder of the counts
to the Court of Appeal for re-determination.
No comments:
Post a Comment